Learning Objectives: To present summaries of research in a coherent and clear manner.
Instructions: You are to read, summarize, and present your interpretation of the paper given to your group below. Your presentation should be emailed to Mary the day before the presentation, and a 1 page handout distributed on the day of the presentation. The presentation should be 10 minutes long. Details on how the presentation will be scored will be given in tutorials with Mary.
Download the list of groups here: Groups EC6012 (Updated)
The papers are linked to below.
Please email Mary your presentation by 11.59AM the day before your group presents. You'll lose 10% for lateness.
How many handouts are required for distribution?
Assume there will be 20 people at the presentation.
Just a presentation? Any questions & answer session?
There will be one or two questions to the group, from either the audience, or from Stephen.
How will this presentation be scored?
The details of scoring will be given in tutorials in week 12.
When will the presentations be held?
We'll use the normal tutorial slots we have in Week 13. Group times and locations will be announced separately.
Groups:
Group 1 C. Dos-Santos, Keynesian Theorizing During Hard Times: Stock-Flow Consistent Models as an Unexplored ‘Frontier’ of Keynesian Macroeconomics
Group 2 G. Zezza, A Post-Keynesian Stock-Flow Consistent Macroeconomic Growth Model: Preliminary Results
Group 3 Godley and Lavoie, Two country stock flow consistent macroeconomics using a closed model within a dollar exchange regime
Group 4 G. Zezza, Dynamic properties of stock-flow models with stable stock-flow norms.
Group 5 C.W.M. Naastepad (2006) Technology, demand and distribution: a cumulative growth model with an application to the Dutch productivity growth slowdown, Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (3) 403-434.
Group 6 M. Lavoie, Endogenous money in a coherent stock-flow framework», in V. Chick and K. Betz (eds), Monetary Policy in a World with Endogenous Money and Global Capital, Routledge, London.
Group 7 L.Taylor, Capital market crises: liberalisation, fixed exchange rates and market-driven destabilisation Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1998
Group 8 L. Taylor, A stagnationist model of economic growth Camb. J. Econ..1985; 9: 383-403
Group 9 P. Davidson, Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Winter, 1991), pp. 129-143
Group 10 Moore B.J. “A global currency for a global economy ” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.: 26 (4), Pages: 631-653
Group 11 Lawrence Klein, 2003. “Some Potential Linkages for Input-Output Analysis with Flow-of-Funds,” Economic Systems Research, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 269-277
Group 12 B. J Moore, The Endogeneity of Credit Money, Review of Political Economy, Volume 1, Issue 1 March 1989 , pages 65 – 93
Group 13 G. Fontana and E. Venturino, Post Keynesian Models of the Credit Market and the Reserve Market, Journal of Computational Methods in Science and Engineering IOS Press
Group 14 Godley, W. and M. Lavoie (2005–06) ‘Comprehensive accounting in simple open economy macroeconomics with endogenous sterilization or flexible exchange rates’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28 (2) (Winter), pp. 241–76.
Group 15 Mundell, R.A. The Pure Theory of International Trade, The American Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 1. (Mar., 1960), pp. 67-110.
Group 16 H. W. Singer The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries The American Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Sixty-second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Asociation. (May, 1950),
Group 17 Lloyd A. Metzler Tariffs, the Terms of Trade, and the Distribution of National Income
The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 57, No. 1. (Feb., 1949), pp. 1-29.